Yes. The descriptive copy on a plan page sits under the same rules as an article. The difference is that the price and data allowance come from synced provider data rather than from something an editor typed, while the explanation of who a plan suits and what its limits are goes through exactly the same review as an article.

Because we have no publicly verifiable individual to attach to that page. The choice is between inventing a credible-sounding name and saying plainly that it is desk work, and we take the second. Those pages still go through review and still have an approver who is accountable for them.

The page is ours, so correcting it and telling readers is our responsibility even when the error originated in what a supplier told us. When we find one, we fix the affected pages, mark it as a correction, and raise it with that supplier. What you are entitled to as a buyer — a refund, for instance — depends on that seller's terms and on how you paid.

Articles here are written by the editorial desk. We do not sell space for someone else to publish an article under our name, and we run no creator or affiliate programme you could join. Our revenue is margin on the plans we sell, commission on offers sold by others, and business orders — all set out on the about page.

Look at the wording. We write according to the provider or according to the manufacturer's specification when the information comes from a partner, and we never write we tested or we measured unless we did it ourselves. If you find a page ambiguous enough that you cannot tell, that is a defect on our side and we would like to hear about it.